Appellant law firm sought review of a judgment rendered by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), that granted summary judgment to appellee insurance company finding that appellee did not have to cover losses because of its contract limitations defense. Overview Appellant law firm filed a complaint against appellee insurance company. The complaint alleged that appellant had suffered loss…
After losing her home to foreclosure, plaintiff sued several defendants, alleging causes of action for negligent misrepresentation, fraud, breach of oral contract, violation of Civ. Code, § 2924g, subd. (g), intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and rescission of foreclosure sale. The Orange County Superior Court, California, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication. Plaintiff appealed. Overview…
There is a great need to know that online casinos allow you the opportunity to grab various types of promotions and bonuses when you play in terms of real money. It’s a kind of an incentive for choosing them over other casinos as well as to convince gamblers to play at their casino. As a new player, you can find…
It is fascinating to know that online casinos have the great opportunity to grow quickly in 2021 due to the crises of corona virus. With brick and motor casinos closed down indefinitely due to lockdown conditions, players who want to play casino classics such blackjack and roulette have little option, to go online instead. Keep in consideration that social media…
Plaintiff former employee sued defendant former employer alleging failure to pay overtime as required by Cal. Lab. Code § 510, improperly reduced commissions violated Cal. Lab. Code § 202, California Unfair Competition law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq., and the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), Cal. Lab. Code § 2698. The…
Defendants, a retailer and its property owner, filed a motion to clarify the court’s prior order that denied in part and granted in part defendants’ and plaintiff disabled customer’s cross-motions for summary judgment. The customer filed his action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act, codified at Cal. Civ. Code § 51. Overview The customer alleged…
HOLDINGS: [1]-Because the corporation co-owned the copyrights at issue at the time of the alleged infringement, the explicit cooperation of counter-defendants strongly militated in favor of a finding that counter-defendants received permission to use those copyrights from a co-owner; [2]-Defendants failed to state a claim as to their copyright infringement counterclaim because the estate was only a co-owner of the…